1. Are all significant historical claims in the body of the text supported by appropriate source evidence?(This would not necessarily apply when the author is introducing a new topic or argument; summarizing atopic or argument just presented; or transitioning to the next topic, argument, section, or chapter.)2. Is the range of source material sufficient and appropriate to the claims being made in the text?3. Does the author rely too heavily on a single source or a limited number of sources?4. Where it seems most appropriate, does the author make use of published and archival sources?5. Does the author integrate various types of evidence in a convincing manner?6. What additional types of sources do you think the author might have included to further support theclaims being made in the book? (Do keep in mind the limitations of what sources are likely to beavailable, but, at the same time, do not hesitate to point out places in the text where the author could havesought out more supporting evidence.)7. Does the author rely too heavily on secondary sources, or are most claims supported with primarysources? (In an original historical research study, often the author will use secondary sources in a limitedfashion to fill in gaps in argumentation and to provide more general background or comparativeperspective, but the majority of the sources for the key sections will typically be primary sources.)Depth Questions (i.e. for particular primary sources examined more closely)1. Are all quotations, paraphrases, or summaries from the primary source accurate? Does the immediatesurrounding material before and after the cited or quoted passage change the meaning in a way that youthink the author should have taken into account?2. If you were analyzing the primary source yourself (think of all the ways you might do this: e.g.,Author, Content, Context, Language, Intent, Meaning, Audience, Time, Evaluation) what would be somekey points you might make? Would any of these points add to or further support the claims andarguments made by the author? Would anything you found in the source complicate, challenge, or refuteany claims made by the author?3. What did you find in the primary source that the author doesn’t mention? Even if what you foundwould neither directly support nor challenge the author’s claims, what additional insights might the authorhave provided based on the other things you found by looking at the source?4. If applicable, look at the title page, first few pages of preface or introduction, opening of the section orchapter where the cited portion of the primary source appears, and the few pages before and after the citedpage(s). Do you see anything in these places that changes how you would interpret the source? Do any ofthese things you found provide further support or challenges to how the author uses this primary source?Did you find anything new or interesting that the author does not mention, but which might be worthincorporating into the book? How might these new insights have changed the author’s conclusions?5. Are there any alternative interpretations of this primary source, based on your own reading of it? Doesthe author’s interpretation seem more plausible? Why or why not?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1veBZPSsMaO-KVPtWgD2dgFPhhht8uE0T/edit
RECENT ASSIGMENTS
Describe and analyze the preparatory steps leading up to baptism, and how it was tied to the Eucharist.”
Discuss the cause of Child Abuse, Forms of Child Abuse, Effects and Consequences of Child Abuse, Physical & Mental Health, Therapy, Counseling, Healing, Prevention,statistics in America, etc.
What are some of the major ethical issues in conducting research that impacts the advanced registered nurse?
Discuss what measures you would take to ensure inclusion of that diversity in your team.
Write a paper on what is Gender History?
What are the main arguments presented by the author(s) of the selected readings?
Discuss your informed opinion on what the subject matter of sociology is all about and the overall goal of sociology and sociologists.
Write a well-developed paragraph of response that has a beginning, middle, and end (mini-essay style).
What did you find
meaningful about this quote, or what did you disagree with, and why?
Write a critical assessment of your search outcomes that synthesizes the evidence from your literature review.
