I need help on Case Study Written Assignment
REVISION please place your bids. Revision instructions: After reviewing this paper, it still does not meet the needs of the assignment (and instructions given.) The paper that was produced is very heavily centered on Police Brutality, which is not the purpose of the assignment. The assignment is to be on Senior Police Leadership. The writer attempted to re-write the paper on Leadership but still missed the mark. It was heavily riddled with errors and at times did not make sense. The paper is also to be 2500 words and the paper that was presented was 5800 words. I am also open to speaking with whomever the paper is assigned to, to clarify any questions they may have. ____________ Initial instructions: Assessment item 5 – Case Study Written Assignment Length: 2,500 words Group Assessment: No Submission method options: EASTS (online) TASK Select a recent scenario that has social and political implications involving a police, public safety or security executive (Assistant Commissioner or Commissioner.) Use this scenario to critically discuss the position of your selected executive and the conflicting influences and pressures that could have impacted on him/her during the scenario. 1. Provide a brief introduction outlining the person you have selected, their agency, the incident/case you are examining and the reason you picked this person and scenario. 2. Review and discuss the types of leadership demonstrated by the executive. Your discussion should consider: a) The range of influencing factors such as political influence, community satisfaction and media pressure that may have been present during this time. (If you are familiar with the PESTLE framework, or one of its variations, you may choose to use it here). b) The theories you have learned throughout this subject. Additional marks will be given for those who go beyond the prescribed readings. c) Any ethical dimensions of this incident. d) The impact of the effect of the leader`s actions on the key stakeholders. 3. Outline and justify your conclusions regarding the competing priorities and management of conflicts in executive leadership. RATIONALE This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s: be able to investigate, analyze and synthesize the broad body of knowledge of the history and context of leadership in law enforcement and security, including relevant developments overseas be able to demonstrate mastery of the key theoretical underpinnings in leadership generally, public sector leadership, and law enforcement and security leadership, and critically reflect on the impact of these on professional practice Criteria High Distinction Distinction Credit Pass Fail Applies established leadership theories to the law enforcement and security context Accurately engages with the range and breath of the concepts, theories and practical applications of contemporary executive leadership. A comprehensive analysis of the context, issues and competing priorities in the scenario. Leadership theories are linked to professional practice with enough interpretation/evaluation, to develop a comprehensive analysis and critical discussion. Evidence of precise engagement with the concepts, theories and practical applications of executive leadership in the sector. A thorough analysis of the context, issues and competing priorities in the scenario. Leadership theories are linked to professional practice with enough interpretation/evaluation, to develop a thorough analysis and critical discussion. Makes connections between the concepts, predominant ideas and practical applications relevant to executive leadership. High level analysis of the context, issues and competing priorities in the scenario. Leadership theories are linked to professional practice with enough interpretation/evaluation, to develop a coherent analysis and critical discussion. Analyses the contextual influences on leadership in the law enforcement and security contexts. A sound analysis of the context, issues and competing priorities in the scenario. Leadership theories are linked to professional practice with enough interpretation/evaluation, to develop a sound analysis and critical discussion. Unfamiliar with concepts relevant to executive leadership in the sector. Descriptive narrative has some discussion and uses ideas and principles introduced in the module. Critically analyses the application of established leadership theories with reference to professional practice Selected a sophisticated case study scenario. Critically discusses the case and the conflicting influences and pressures on the executive Clearly evaluates the literature, and provided sophisticated insights into the topic. Makes sophisticated conclusions and recommendations. Case study scenario selected illustrates in depth understanding of the topic. Produced a thoughtful analysis of the case and the conflicting influences and pressures on the executive. Evaluates the literature thoroughly, and provides excellent insights into the topic. Makes succinct and thoughtful conclusions and recommendations. Selected appropriate case study scenario. Explains the case and the conflicting influences and pressures on the executive. Evaluates the literature, and provides appropriate insights into the topic. Makes sound and supported recommendations. Selected appropriate case study scenario. Discusses the case and the conflicting influences and pressures on the executive. Evaluates the literature, and provides some insight into the topic. Makes appropriate conclusions and recommendations. Selected inappropriate case study scenario. Did not evaluate the literature and provided no new insights into the topic. Plans and executes a substantial piece of scholarship. Demonstrates sophisticated research, analysis and synthesis skills, using sophisticated ideas and principles Accurately and consistently adheres to APA 7th style referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list. Located, evaluated and synthesised sophisticated information from sources that substantially supports the responses. Language features and essay structure is used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, concisely, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose with no spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Use of scholarly conventions reflects extensive research. Demonstrates advanced analysis and synthesis skills using ideas and principles. Accurately and consistently adheres to APA 7th style referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list. Located, evaluated and synthesised highly relevant information from sources that supports the response. Language features and essay structure is used to convey meaning effectively, clearly, unambiguously, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose. No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Use of scholarly conventions reflects a high level of research. Demonstrates analysis and synthesis skills using advanced ideas and principles. Almost always accurately and consistently adheres to APA 7th style referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list. Located, evaluated and analysed relevant information from subject and additional sources that supports the response. Language features and essay structure conveys meaning clearly and effectively, and in a tone appropriate to the audience and purpose. No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors. Use of scholarly conventions reflects an adequate level of research undertaken. Demonstrates competent analysis using ideas and principles supported by research. Adheres to APA 7th style referencing conventions in both in text referencing and the reference list, but with some errors. Located, evaluated and incorporated relevant information from subject and additional sources that supports the response. The text contains infrequent errors and is clearly written and well structured. May lack clarity occasionally, but the meaning is apparent to the reader with little effort. Limited evidence of research in the course literature. Descriptive narrative includes frequent unsupported facts and opinions. Does not adhere to APA 7th style referencing conventions and/or in text referencing Information does not support the response. The text contains frequent errors in spelling, grammar and structure. be able to apply established leadership theories to the law enforcement and security context and critically analyse the application of these with reference to your professional practice be able to demonstrate an ability to analyse the contextual influences on leadership in the law enforcement and security contexts and to develop a strategic leadership approach capable of being communicated to a range of professional and high level audiences. be able to plan and execute a substantial piece of scholarship which demonstrates a capacity to locate and analyse relevant theory and research in the field of leadership in law enforcement and security and apply that theory and research to professional leadership practice This assessment gives you the opportunity to: Engage in high-level critical thinking to identify the links between leadership theory and leading in a contemporary organization. Consider multiple perspectives when assessing leadership within a complex organization. Consider how to tailor leadership approaches to different issues. Consider the various implications of higher office and the difference between `legislative office v reality`. MARKING CRITERIA AND STANDARDS Your assessment will be marked against the following criteria. PRESENTATION Essays are not just exercises in research; they are also exercises in communication. Writing allows you to crystallize your thinking about the things you have been learning and to communicate this to others. Essays provide you a chance to show what you can do: that you understand the question asked; that you understand the issues involved; and that you have done an appropriate amount of research and reading to allow you to gain a reasonable understanding of the issues. The essay writing process is a chance for you to demonstrate your analytical thinking and helps a deep and powerful type of learning to take place. Following is guidance for your essay: The essay must be in MS Word format. The essay structure must consist of an introduction/discussion/conclusion. 12 point Times New Roman or Arial 11 point. 1.5 line spacing. Text justified left. One line separating paragraphs. No numbered or bullet-point lists. Use APA referencing in text. Use a reference list. No footnotes to be used. Following is guidance to help you select a case study. Select a case: Occurred within the last 5 years. Where you had no personal involvement. From any geographical location. With a lot written about it, perhaps one that was subject to an inquiry. That is NOT one of the cases mentioned in this subject. REQUIREMENTS The reference list must have at least 10 publications and may consist of a mix of academic journal articles, texts and reports. When considering competing pressures do not dwell on the operational constraints, such as staffing levels. Instead think about more strategic social, political and criminal justice issues. “Executive” in policing refers to the most senior ranks. In Australia that would be Assistant Commissioner or above but more often it is the Commissioner.
GraduateAssistants.net is among the highest quality and affordable writing services around.
Our writers have excelled in diverse backgrounds and have been well vetted to work on your assignments.
Homework is a very important segment of your coursework, and We, therefore, understand that you need to excel in your homework.
We take your homework seriously and we only guarantee high grades!
We prepare original work and attach a free plagiarism report!
We will not let you down!
Place your Order Now
